MarTech is having a weirdly great moment: budgets are scrutinized, privacy is tightening, and AI is rewriting workflows — which means investors are more selective, but the winners can scale fast. The best outcome isn't "a famous logo on your deck." It's an investor whose distribution, platform leverage, and buyer access match how your product actually grows.

Below is a curated list of 8 highly active, high-reputation MarTech investors in 2025 (no generic "we invest in everything" mega-funds), plus a practical framework to pick the right ones and pitch like a grown-up.

When preparing your pitch, having a professional data room is essential. Peony helps MarTech startups organize investor materials with AI-powered document organization, track investor engagement with page-level analytics, and securely share sensitive financial and operational data. With transparent pricing at $40/user/month, Peony delivers enterprise-grade secure data rooms without the $5,000-20,000 per-deal costs of legacy platforms.

1) How to pick the right MarTech investors (the best fit beats the biggest name)

A. Start with your MarTech "lane" (investors self-sort hard)

Most MarTech investors cluster around a few lanes:

Marketing automation / lifecycle / engagement (email/SMS/push, personalization, retention)
Measurement & attribution / MMM / incrementality (proving ROI, causal inference, cross-channel)
Creative & content tooling (AI creative, video gen, asset workflows)
Data infrastructure / CDP / identity / consent (privacy-era first-party data plumbing)
Commerce + CX tech (loyalty, offers, conversion, post-purchase, CX ops)
AdTech ↔ MarTech convergence (retail media, CTV, programmatic tooling)

Pick investors who already win in your lane—because they'll have pattern recognition, customer intros, and fewer "teach me the category" meetings.

B. Choose the investor type based on your go-to-market reality

Strategic/CVC (platform-backed)

Great if integrations, distribution, and partnerships matter. Examples: Salesforce Ventures, Adobe Ventures, HubSpot Ventures. They can accelerate ecosystem deals and credibility, but you should understand platform incentives. (Salesforce)

Operator-network VC (GTM-heavy)

Best when the problem is execution: pipeline, positioning, enterprise rollout, pricing, repeatable motion. Stage 2 is a classic "GTM help is the product" investor. (Gilion VC Mapping)

Category specialists (adtech/martech natives)

If you're in measurement, retail media, identity, curation, etc., a specialist like Aperiam can be massively valuable because they live inside the market. (Aperiam Ventures)

Growth capital (scaling distribution + economics)

If you're post-PMF with strong revenue momentum and need expansion capital, growth investors like Prysm can be the right tool. (Wall Street Journal)

C. Match stage + deal shape (or you'll waste weeks)

Pre-seed/seed: you're selling insight + trajectory
Series A: you're selling repeatability (ICP, retention, unit economics, sales motion)
Growth: you're selling efficiency + expansion (NRR, CAC payback, margins, multi-product)

Many MarTech founders lose time pitching "growth investors" with seed metrics or pitching "seed investors" with a scale story. Tighten the match early.

D. One underrated filter: "who are your buyers, and who has access?"

MarTech is buyer-driven. If your buyers are:

CMO / VP Marketing → measurement + creative + lifecycle investors help
RevOps / Growth → pipeline + GTM investors help
CIO / Data → CDP / infra-fluent investors help
Brands/retailers → commerce ecosystem investors help

The best investors don't just "advise." They can put you in rooms with design partners.

2) Detailed profiles: Top 8 MarTech investors in 2025 (active + reputable)

1) Aperiam Ventures (AdTech + MarTech specialist)

Why they matter: Aperiam is explicitly positioned as an adtech/martech-focused investor and operator group, with a big footprint across the adtech↔martech boundary (retail media, identity, CTV, creative tech, AI). (Aperiam Ventures)

Best for: Adtech/martech infrastructure, measurement, retail media, identity/consent, creative tech, and anything that needs deep industry connectivity.

What they look for: Category-defining wedges in markets with real spend, clear buyers, and defensible data or workflow lock-in.

How they help (practically): They emphasize hands-on value (advisory + orchestration / matchmaking with buyers), which is unusually relevant in MarTech where distribution is everything. (AdExchanger)

2) HubSpot Ventures (GTM ecosystem + SMB marketing stack)

Why they matter: HubSpot Ventures invests in software companies and publishes an active portfolio with recent investments—strong signal they're continuously deploying. (HubSpot)

Best for: SMB and mid-market GTM tooling: lifecycle marketing, AI assistants for marketers, sales/marketing automation, customer engagement, and integrations that fit HubSpot's customer base.

What they look for: Products that help companies "grow better" and can either integrate into or complement HubSpot's ecosystem. (Hightouch)

Founder sentiment signal: They highlight founders learning from HubSpot's product/marketing leadership—i.e., value beyond capital. (HubSpot)

3) Salesforce Ventures (enterprise distribution + ecosystem gravity)

Why they matter: Salesforce Ventures has been aggressively active with large funds (including a $1B AI fund) and public updates on deployment pace—strong proof of 2025 activity. (Salesforce)

Best for: Enterprise MarTech adjacent to CRM: customer engagement, marketing automation, analytics, AI for GTM teams, data + workflow products that can become ecosystem-native.

What they look for: Category leaders that can become meaningful inside the Salesforce orbit (partnership potential is often a major upside). (Salesforce Ventures)

How they help: Distribution, credibility in enterprise procurement, and strategic alignment opportunities.

4) Adobe Ventures (creative + digital experience + content workflows)

Why they matter: Adobe Ventures positions itself as a strategic investor helping build category-defining companies, with access to Adobe's ecosystem. (Adobe)

Best for: Creative tooling, content supply chain, creative automation, brand/experience workflows, and products that sit at the intersection of creative + marketing ops.

What they look for: Products that extend or integrate with Adobe's platform footprint and unlock next-gen workflows. (Adobe)

How they help: Strategic partnership motion, ecosystem navigation, credibility with creative/marketing orgs. (Adobe)

5) Stage 2 Capital (GTM-first VC with a huge operator bench)

Why they matter: Stage 2 is known for being backed by a large network of GTM leaders—designed to help companies scale revenue, not just raise money. (Gilion VC Mapping)

Best for: B2B MarTech where winning requires a repeatable go-to-market machine: pipeline tooling, RevOps, sales/marketing workflow, conversation intelligence, demand gen infrastructure.

What they look for: Early-stage B2B software with signals of GTM fit (early repeatability, clear ICP pain, growing efficiency). (stage2.capital)

Recent activity signal: They participated in funding for a marketing AI agent company (Auxia), showing relevance to modern MarTech + AI. (Business Insider)

6) VMG Technology Partners (commerce infrastructure + Marketing/CX tech)

Why they matter: VMG's tech arm explicitly calls out Marketing/CX Tech as part of their focus, plus a clear check-size range—rarely this crisp. (vmgpartners.com)

Best for: MarTech tied to commerce outcomes: loyalty/offers, CX automation, retail ecosystems, performance marketing tooling, and vertical SaaS serving brands/retailers.

What they look for: Tech that meaningfully supports brands/retailers; they also emphasize customer development via their consumer/retail ecosystem. (vmgpartners.com)

Why founders like them: Their model is explicitly "ecosystem-led" and GTM-supportive—super relevant if your biggest bottleneck is landing credible brand customers. (vmgpartners.com)

7) Comcast Ventures (advertising, media, and the creative stack)

Why they matter: Comcast Ventures actively invests in advertising-adjacent tooling (example: AI video generation for advertising creative), and they're structurally close to media/advertising distribution. (comcastventures.com)

Best for: Ad creative tooling, CTV/streaming-adjacent infrastructure, marketing video, and "brand-to-broadcast" workflows.

What they look for: Scalable tech businesses in areas including advertising; strategic leverage matters here. (Comcast Corporation)

How they help: Media ecosystem access, strategic partnerships, enterprise credibility with advertisers and platforms.

8) Prysm Capital (growth investor backing modern marketing measurement)

Why they matter: Prysm co-led a major 2025 round in Alembic (AI marketing measurement / causal AI), indicating real activity and relevance to modern MarTech (measurement is back). (Wall Street Journal)

Best for: Companies at/near scale where capital is used to expand distribution, deepen product, and compound growth efficiency—especially measurement/analytics-heavy MarTech.

What they look for: Durable businesses and disruptive category leaders; they emphasize partnership as companies scale. (Prysm Capital)

Bonus signal: Growth + strategic co-investors (like Accenture) can accelerate enterprise adoption if you're already enterprise-ready. (Accenture Newsroom)

3) Five quick tips to pitch MarTech investors (and actually get to "yes")

Lead with the money trail (not the feature) MarTech is judged on revenue impact. Open with:

"We reduce CAC by X%," "increase conversion by Y%," "improve retention by Z%," or "prove incrementality vs last-click."

Prove you have an unfair data/workflow advantage Investors have seen 500 "AI for marketing" decks. The question is:

What do you see (data, context, workflow position) that others can't copy?

Show your distribution plan in 3 concrete channels Pick your three and be specific:

Platform marketplaces (HubSpot/Salesforce/Adobe ecosystem)
Agency/partner channel
Vertical wedge (industry-specific ICP)
Community/content engine
Outbound + proof of repeatability

Bring one "measurement artifact" Even at seed, show some proof:

holdout tests
cohort retention lift
pipeline impact
before/after conversion
multi-touch correlation + a plan to get to causality

Pre-answer the hard objections MarTech investors will probe:

"Is this a feature in 12 months?"
"Does privacy break this?"
"Can you survive platform shifts?"
"Why you vs incumbents?" Have those slides ready.

Why professional data rooms matter for MarTech startup fundraising

MarTech startups need to present complex documentation—financial projections, customer metrics, partnership agreements, and market analysis—professionally to build investor confidence.

Peony helps MarTech startups create investor-ready data rooms with AI-powered organization that sets up in minutes instead of weeks.

Key benefits: page-level analytics show which documents investors review most, enterprise security protects sensitive information, and transparent pricing at $40/user/month—93-99% cheaper than legacy platforms charging $5,000-20,000 per deal.

Conclusion

MarTech fundraising in 2025 requires matching your lane, stage, and buyer access to the right investors. The investors on this list are actively deploying capital, but they're selective. Bring revenue impact, distribution clarity, and measurement proof—not just vision.

Having a professional data room is table stakes for serious fundraising. Peony helps MarTech startups organize investor materials, track engagement, and securely share sensitive data at a fraction of legacy platform costs.

Ready to pitch MarTech investors? Set up your investor data room with Peony in minutes, not weeks.

Q&A Section

What's the best way to organize investor materials for MarTech startup fundraising?

Peony offers AI-powered document organization that automatically structures financials, customer metrics, partnership agreements, and market analysis into a professional data room in minutes. Page-level analytics show which documents investors review most, helping you anticipate questions.

How can I track which investors are most engaged with my MarTech startup pitch?

Peony provides page-level analytics showing which documents investors review and how much time they spend on each section. This helps identify serious investors and tailor follow-up conversations with actionable insights.

What's the most cost-effective data room solution for MarTech startups raising seed or Series A?

Peony offers transparent pricing at $40/user/month—93-99% cheaper than legacy platforms charging $5,000-20,000 per deal. For a 5-person team, Peony costs $200/month vs $3,000-5,000+ for legacy platforms, delivering enterprise features at startup-friendly pricing.

How do I securely share sensitive customer metrics and financial information with MarTech investors?

Peony provides enterprise-grade security with identity-bound access, dynamic watermarking, and screenshot protection. With link expiry and instant access revocation, you maintain complete control over sensitive documentation.

What data room features are essential for MarTech startups pitching to investors?

MarTech startups need data rooms that handle complex documentation: financials, customer metrics, partnership agreements, and market analysis. Peony offers AI-powered organization, page-level analytics, custom branding, and comprehensive security. With 10-minute setup vs weeks for legacy platforms, Peony helps MarTech startups look professional without breaking the budget.

Impress Investors

Top 8 MarTech Investors in 2025: Complete Founder Guide to Getting Funded