ShareVault Review 2026: Pricing Reality, the BIO Endorsement, and Who It Actually Fits

Quick answer. ShareVault is a genuine life-science VDR specialist (in market since 2006, and BIO-endorsed per bio.org) with real controls — dynamic watermarking, IRM-based remote shredding, and bulk AI redaction, all per its own pages. But its pricing is quote-gated on every tier — the only number its plan pages advertise is an asterisked "as low as $200/mth" floor — and our editorial scoring puts Ease of Use at 3.3/5 and Value at 2.7/5. It is best for life-science teams that want the vertical specialist and the BIO member discount; price-transparent buyers and single-deal teams should compare flat-rate options first.

I'm Deqian Jia, co-founder of Peony, a data room company. I run a ShareVault competitor, so read this as segmented advice, not a neutral verdict — but it is the honest review I would want if I were the one evaluating ShareVault anyway. I have watched a lot of life-science teams shortlist ShareVault on the strength of the "endorsed by BIO" line, request a quote, hit a wall where no list price exists, and then wonder whether the specialization is substance or marketing. The short version: much of it is substance. ShareVault is a real, focused, life-science VDR with at least one capability I will credit plainly. It also has trade-offs — chiefly opaque pricing and a dated interface — that decide whether it is right for you.

I'll credit what is real, verify every capability in ShareVault's own words, and land a clear verdict with who-should and who-shouldn't. We serve 6,800+ customers and roughly $26.3B in client assets flows through Peony rooms, but I have no interest in steering a BIO-member biotech away from a specialist that fits its process — or toward Peony when it doesn't. The goal is to help you decide.

What is ShareVault, and who is it built for?

ShareVault is a life-science-focused virtual data room — one of the oldest still-independent VDRs in the category, purpose-built for biotech, pharma, medtech, and CROs. A virtual data room is secure software for sharing confidential documents with controlled access, permission walls, watermarks, and audit trails during a transaction or partnership; if you want the category primer, see what is a virtual data room. What makes ShareVault distinct is not the data-room mechanics — most VDRs have those — but its vertical specialization and its relationship with the life-science community.

The company facts, per ShareVault's own about page: it was founded in 2003 as Pandesa Corporation, introduced its virtual data room to market in 2006, and is headquartered in Los Gatos, California. The current site brands solely as ShareVault. Nearly two decades of continuous operation in one vertical is a real credential — this is not a general file-sharing tool that bolted on a "life sciences" landing page.

Per ShareVault's own life-sciences page, it "empowers life sciences companies—across biotech, pharma, medtech, CROs, and beyond—to collaborate with precision and safeguard sensitive IP," under taglines like "Maintain Control, Drive Innovation." The center of gravity is the life-science IP owner: a team sharing clinical trial data, regulatory dossiers, and licensing packages that must stay locked down. If that is your process, ShareVault is squarely aimed at you. If you are running general mid-market M&A or a private fundraise with no life-science angle, keep reading — you may be paying for specialization you will not use, and the top VDR providers roundup maps the broader field.

How much does ShareVault cost in 2026?

You cannot find a standard list price on sharevault.com — every tier is quote-gated, and the only number ShareVault advertises is an asterisked "as low as" floor. All three tiers on its own pricing page show only a "GET PRICING" button (checked July 2026): Express, positioned "For Smaller Deals or Simple Sharing"; Pro, labeled "BEST VALUE!" and pitched "For Serious Dealmakers"; and Enterprise, "For Complex, Ongoing Secure File Sharing." No list price appears on it — the dollar figure ShareVault does show sits on its plan pages as a footnoted floor, covered next. This is the honesty beat of the review, so let me be precise rather than snide about it.

Here is the trap. The specific "$199/month Express" figure that circulates on third-party review sites — and, in fairness, that our own earlier Peony vs ShareVault comparison echoed — is not on ShareVault's site. Search ShareVault's pricing page for "$199" and it is simply absent; that page contains only plan names and repeated "GET PRICING" prompts. What ShareVault's own plan pages do advertise is a floor: "Pricing as low as" $200/mth, footnoted to minimum storage, a 12-month prepaid term, and applicable discounts — with a note that additional discounts may apply. A best-case floor built on stacked discounts is not a list price you can budget on, but it is a number, it is ShareVault's own, and it is almost certainly where the third-party $199 echo comes from. I am correcting our own prior coverage here on purpose: the accurate statement is that ShareVault is quote-gated, with a discounted as-low-as $200/mth floor and no standard list price.

What ShareVault does say about its commercial model, in its own words: it offers "transparent, no-surprise pricing with no hidden fees or additional costs," and you "pay only for the features and storage you need, without unnecessary extras," per its pricing page. Our top-10 ranking characterizes the underlying model as quote-based across three tiers, priced by storage volume and project duration, with no setup fees — and an estimated annual range of roughly $6,000 to $30,000+ per year, which is our own estimate, not a ShareVault figure.

On the free trial, the sources genuinely disagree, so I will attribute each: ShareVault's own pricing and life-sciences pages advertise a free trial but state no duration, while bio.org separately describes a free one-month trial for BIO members. Do not assume a single number — confirm your actual trial length with sales. Because everything is quote-gated, the only accurate price is the one you request for your exact scope; sanity-check whatever ShareVault quotes against category benchmarks in our VDR pricing guide.

Does ShareVault offer dynamic watermarking, view-only access, and remote document shredding?

Yes to all three — and remote shredding is the capability I will credit as a genuine differentiator. Here is exactly what ShareVault claims, in its own words from its features page, so you can verify each one:

• Dynamic watermarking. ShareVault describes "customizable watermarks that timestamp and identify users on documents for added security." These are listed as plug-in-free protection features, so viewers do not need to install anything to see the watermark applied.
• View-only access. Its "secure, user-friendly file viewers enable users to view content effortlessly" with "plug-in-free file protection features," delivering controlled, view-only rendering of sensitive files inside the room.
• Remote document shredding via IRM. This is the standout. ShareVault delivers remote shredding through Information Rights Management (IRM), which "remotely shreds downloaded documents to maintain confidentiality and control." In plain terms: even after a file has been downloaded to a viewer's device, ShareVault can revoke and destroy it.

That post-download control is real, and it is not something every VDR offers. I will be consistent with our own coverage: our Peony vs ShareVault comparison concedes directly that remote document shredding is a genuine capability Peony does not offer. If the ability to claw back a file after it has left the room is a hard requirement for your IP-protection posture, that is a legitimate reason to shortlist ShareVault.

ShareVault's life-sciences page bundles the core stack the same way, describing "dynamic watermarking, remote shredding and screen capture blocking" as how "the company retains full control over its most valuable asset." Screen-capture blocking rounds out the set. For the mechanics of watermarking generally — and how much protection it does and does not buy you — see our dynamic watermarking guide.

Is ShareVault's AI redaction real, and what does it actually do?

It is real, it is useful for life-science data, and it is narrow. ShareVault's features page describes "Bulk AI-Powered Redaction" that will "automatically redact personally-identifiable information (PII) and/or protected health information (PHI) from documents in large batches using advanced AI processing." For a team that has to strip PHI out of hundreds of clinical or patient documents before sharing, batch AI redaction is a legitimately valuable, time-saving capability — and it maps directly to the compliance-sensitive nature of life-science diligence.

The honest caveat: batch redaction is ShareVault's only AI feature. It is not AI document Q&A, it is not AI-assisted auto-indexing, and it is not completeness scoring — capabilities that modern deal platforms increasingly ship. Our top-10 ranking notes that ShareVault's AI is limited versus more modern platforms, and that document uploading still requires manual tagging and folder specification, which reviewers describe as tedious versus AI auto-indexing. Our editorial Analytics score for ShareVault is 2.8/5, and the shallow AI footprint is part of why. If your goal is redacting large PHI/PII sets, ShareVault's tool is a real fit. If you want conversational intelligence across a full diligence room, this is a place ShareVault trails the frontier — see our redaction in due diligence guide for how redaction fits the broader workflow.

Is ShareVault suitable for life sciences companies sharing clinical trial data?

Yes — this is precisely the use case ShareVault is built around, and it is where the product is strongest. Per its own life-sciences page, ShareVault "empowers life sciences companies—across biotech, pharma, medtech, CROs, and beyond—to collaborate with precision and safeguard sensitive IP," and it markets templates aligned to clinical trial data, FDA/EMA-style regulatory submissions, and biopharma licensing. For a biotech sharing a clinical data package with a potential pharma partner under a CDA, that vertical fit is real and hard to replicate with a general-purpose tool.

On compliance, report ShareVault's claims as its own, not as independently audited fact. ShareVault's life-sciences FAQ states that it "complies fully with regulatory standards such as FDA 21 CFR Part 11, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001, and SOC 2," and its hero calls it "an ISO-Certified secure file sharing platform for Life Science professionals." Those are ShareVault's representations — verify each against what your quote and contract actually warrant, especially FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and ISO 27001, which are meaningful commitments to confirm in writing.

For clinical trial data specifically, the IP-protection stack that matters is the one ShareVault describes as "dynamic watermarking, remote shredding and screen capture blocking," plus its HIPAA-compliant environment for handling PHI. One point of realism worth keeping: pharma BD teams and venture investors accept any professional, access-gated VDR, so ShareVault's specialization is a helpful signal and a comfort factor — not a diligence requirement your counterparties will impose. If you want a life-science specialist and value the branding, ShareVault is a credible, purpose-built choice; for the broader vertical landscape, see our biotech data room guide and our roundup of the best data rooms for healthcare and life sciences.

What does ShareVault's BIO endorsement actually mean?

The endorsement is real — and it is worth stating precisely, because it is widely misread. Per bio.org, "ShareVault is the only secure document-sharing platform endorsed by BIO and 44 life science associations." What it is: part of BIO Business Solutions, BIO's member cost-savings purchasing program, where member companies save 25%+ per bio.org, with a free one-month trial. What it is not: a security certification or a diligence requirement. It says nothing about SOC 2, ISO 27001, or encryption that a technical review would assess independently, and no pharma BD team will reject your room for lacking it.

One point of precision, in fairness to ShareVault: its own materials cite 50+ life science associations rather than the 44 on bio.org, and it attributes each figure to its source. Both numbers are vendor self-claims routed through BIO rather than an independently audited count — so cite whichever source you are quoting, and treat the endorsement as what it is: a credible community signal and a genuine procurement discount, not a technical bar that other platforms fail. If your company is a BIO member, the discount is a tangible benefit worth factoring into the quote. For the full deep dive on how the endorsement reads in context, see the dedicated section in our best data rooms for healthcare and life sciences guide.

ShareVault vs Intralinks: which fits investment banks and corporate teams?

For investment banks and corporate development teams, Intralinks is usually the more natural fit; for life-science IP owners, ShareVault is. These two products sit at different points in the market, and matching the tool to the process is the whole decision.

Intralinks (owned by SS&C) is a cross-border, enterprise-grade platform with a long banking pedigree and its own IRM-based post-download controls. It is built for large, competitive, banking-led processes — the kind investment banks and corporate M&A teams run at scale. It is also quote-only, and typically lands in a $10,000 to $200,000+ per year range with a documented 10% annual uplift clause, per our top-10 ranking. It is heavier, pricier, and deeper on process than ShareVault.

ShareVault is the vertical life-science specialist: a lighter footprint, quote-only, purpose-built for biotech, pharma, medtech, and CRO diligence rather than large sell-side M&A process depth. It brings the BIO endorsement, life-science templates, and remote shredding — but it does not pretend to be a banking-scale deal machine.

So the read for a banker or a corp-dev lead: if you are running competitive auctions, cross-border enterprise M&A, or high-volume corporate transactions, Intralinks (or Datasite) has the process tooling you need. If your "deal" is a licensing package, a partnering room, or a biotech raise, ShareVault's specialization and member discount matter more than banking-grade process depth. Neither publishes a rate card, so get parallel written quotes; see our Intralinks alternatives coverage for the enterprise field and the VDR pricing guide to benchmark whatever number you are quoted.

ShareVault vs Datasite: which is better for life sciences deals?

It comes down to deal scale. Datasite is the per-page mega-deal machine: custom-quoted at roughly $50K+ per deal, $0.40 to $0.85 per page, and $50,000 to $200,000+ per year in our top-10 ranking, with the deepest sell-side process tooling in the category and a heavy AI investment cadence. It is what a strategic acquirer reaches for when a pharma carve-out runs to millions of pages with staffed Q&A.

ShareVault is the life-science specialist: endorsed by BIO, HIPAA-compliant per its own claims, with templates geared to clinical trial data and regulatory submissions, plus remote document shredding for IP control. It is not built to run a mega-cap process, and it does not price like one.

For a mega-cap pharma or large-medtech transaction, Datasite earns its premium — the process depth and page-scale handling are worth it. For a founder-led biotech, a licensing process, or a mid-size raise where you want the vertical specialist and the member discount, ShareVault fits better and costs less. Both are quote-only, so the only way to compare honestly is to request real numbers for your specific scope and page count.

How does ShareVault score, and what do reviewers say?

On our editorial scoring, ShareVault is strong on security and weak on transparency and modernity. These are Peony's own scores from our top-10 VDR ranking, presented as our editorial view, based on 35 deals analyzed:

The shape tells the story: Document Security at 3.9/5 reflects a real, differentiated security stack (remote shredding via IRM, dynamic watermarking, screen-capture blocking). Value at 2.7/5 reflects the quote-only opacity — you cannot see what you are paying before a sales call. Ease of Use at 3.3/5 and Analytics at 2.8/5 reflect a dated interface and shallow analytics/AI relative to newer platforms.

On reviewer sentiment, I will reuse only the lineage our Peony vs ShareVault comparison already carries, with its attribution — I am not inventing quotes. Per that page, ShareVault reviewers consistently flag the interface as dated: "needs bringing up to date, the pages and buttons are quite old and very basic," "tags and icons are very difficult to identify," and it "comes off as overwhelming at first," with the UI described as "not that much intuitive." Separately, our top-10 ranking records ShareVault at G2 4.6/5 across 92 reviews — a solid aggregate score, even as individual reviewers grumble about the interface. The net read: customers who need the specialization largely stick with it, while acknowledging the UI shows its age.

On integrations and NDAs, our comparison lineage notes ShareVault integrates with electronic lab notebooks (ELNs), DocuSign, Salesforce, and Office 365, and offers clickwrap NDA acceptance (legally enforceable under UETA and ESIGN), with DocuSign handling full e-signatures. If native, in-platform e-signature and modern usability rank high for you, weigh that against the specialization.

Is ShareVault worth it — and for whom?

ShareVault is worth it for a specific buyer: a life-science team that wants a vertical specialist, values the BIO member discount, and can absorb a quote-gated contract. For everyone else, the quote-only pricing and dated interface are reasons to compare transparently priced rooms first. Here is the honest split.

ShareVault is likely the right call if:

• You are a biotech, pharma, medtech, or CRO sharing clinical trial data, regulatory dossiers, or licensing packages, and you want a platform built for exactly that.
• You are a BIO member who will actually use the 25%+ Business Solutions discount, which can make the quote reasonable.
• Post-download control is a hard requirement — remote shredding via IRM is a genuine differentiator ShareVault delivers and many rooms do not.
• You need bulk PII/PHI redaction as a routine step before sharing sensitive documents.

ShareVault is likely the wrong call if:

• You are a price-transparent buyer who needs to see a number before a sales call — everything is quote-gated, and our Value score of 2.7/5 reflects that.
• You are running a single deal or a one-off small transaction where a specialist, project-duration-billed contract is overkill.
• You are running general mid-market M&A or an investment-banking-led auction with no life-science angle — Intralinks, Datasite, or a modern flat-rate room fit better.
• Modern usability and deep AI (document Q&A, auto-indexing) rank high for your team — ShareVault's interface is dated and its AI stops at redaction.

If you land in the "wrong call" column, route yourself to our ShareVault alternatives guide, which maps the transparent-pricing and flat-rate options in detail.

I run Peony, a data room company serving 6,800+ customers, so here is my explicit concession and my explicit pitch, kept to one honest paragraph. If post-download remote shredding or a BIO-member discount is decisive for you, ShareVault wins that comparison — Peony does not offer remote shredding, and I would not pretend otherwise. Where Peony fits is the price-transparent, flat-rate case: unlimited data rooms at $52/user/month with free viewers, AI document Q&A, page-level analytics, dynamic watermarks, screenshot protection, and native e-signatures, and Peony is GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA compliant — while being honest that it does not sign BAAs, claim FDA 21 CFR Part 11, or hold ISO 27001, all of which ShareVault does claim. Segment accordingly: ShareVault for the life-science specialist with the member discount and remote shredding; a flat-rate room when a published price and modern workflow matter more. Compare the head-to-head on our Peony vs ShareVault comparison page, and see current Peony pricing for the full tiers.

Frequently asked questions

How much does ShareVault cost — is there any published pricing?

Not as a standard list price. All three tiers — Express ("For Smaller Deals or Simple Sharing"), Pro (labeled "BEST VALUE!"), and Enterprise — show only a "GET PRICING" button on ShareVault's own pricing page (checked July 2026), so there is no standard list price to compare before a sales call. The one number ShareVault's plan pages advertise is an asterisked as-low-as $200/mth floor — based on minimum storage, a 12-month prepaid term, and applicable discounts — which likely explains the "$199/month Express" figure on third-party review sites (a street echo our own earlier comparison coverage repeated, not a ShareVault list price). Our own editorial Value score is 2.7/5, largely because your real number still requires a sales call. Request a written quote for your exact scope, then compare it against flat-rate rooms.

Does ShareVault offer dynamic watermarking, view-only access, and remote document shredding?

Yes to all three, per ShareVault's own features page. Its dynamic watermarking applies "customizable watermarks that timestamp and identify users on documents," and its secure viewers deliver plug-in-free view-only access. The standout is remote shredding, delivered through Information Rights Management (IRM): ShareVault says it "remotely shreds downloaded documents to maintain confidentiality and control" — meaning it can revoke a file after it has left the room and reached a viewer's device. That post-download control is a genuine differentiator, and our own Peony vs ShareVault comparison concedes plainly that Peony does not offer remote shredding. ShareVault's life-sciences page bundles "dynamic watermarking, remote shredding and screen capture blocking" as its core IP-protection stack. If post-download revocation is critical for you, this is a real reason to shortlist ShareVault.

Is ShareVault's AI redaction real, and what does it actually do?

It is real, and it is narrow. ShareVault's features page describes "Bulk AI-Powered Redaction" that will "automatically redact personally-identifiable information (PII) and/or protected health information (PHI) from documents in large batches using advanced AI processing." That is a legitimately useful capability for life-science and healthcare teams handling PHI at volume. The important honesty note: batch redaction is ShareVault's only AI feature. It is not AI document Q&A, not auto-indexing, and not completeness scoring — capabilities modern deal platforms increasingly ship. Our editorial Analytics score for ShareVault is 2.8/5, partly reflecting that AI depth stops at redaction. If your workflow is redacting large PHI/PII sets before sharing, ShareVault's tool fits; if you want conversational document intelligence across a diligence room, look wider.

Is ShareVault really endorsed by BIO, and does that matter?

Yes, the endorsement is real. Per bio.org, "ShareVault is the only secure document-sharing platform endorsed by BIO and 44 life science associations." What it is: BIO's Business Solutions program, a member cost-savings purchasing program where member companies save 25%+, per bio.org. What it is not: a security certification or a diligence requirement. It does not mean ShareVault is more secure than other SOC 2 platforms, and no pharma BD team will reject your room for lacking it. ShareVault's own materials cite 50+ life science associations rather than 44, and attribute each figure to its source; treat both as vendor self-claims routed through BIO, not an independent audit. It is a genuine procurement discount and a credible signal — just not a technical bar.

ShareVault vs Intralinks — which fits investment banks and corporate development teams?

For investment banks and corporate development teams, Intralinks is usually the more natural fit; for life-science IP owners, ShareVault is. Intralinks (SS&C) is a cross-border, enterprise-grade platform with a long banking pedigree and its own post-download IRM controls — but it is quote-only and typically runs $10,000 to $200,000+ per year, per our top-10 ranking. ShareVault is the vertical life-science specialist: lighter footprint, quote-only, purpose-built for biotech, pharma, medtech, and CRO diligence rather than large sell-side M&A process depth. If you run competitive banking-led auctions or high-volume corporate M&A, Intralinks (or Datasite) has the process tooling. If your deal is a licensing package, a partnering room, or a biotech raise, ShareVault's specialization and BIO discount matter more. Neither publishes a rate card, so get parallel written quotes.

ShareVault vs Datasite — which is better for life sciences deals?

It depends on deal scale. Datasite is the per-page mega-deal machine: custom-quoted at roughly $50K+ per deal, $0.40 to $0.85 per page, and $50,000 to $200,000+ per year in our top-10 ranking, with the deepest sell-side process tooling in the category. ShareVault is the life-science specialist — endorsed by BIO, HIPAA-compliant per its own claims, with templates geared to clinical trial data and regulatory submissions, and remote document shredding for IP control. For a mega-cap pharma carve-out or a strategic acquirer running millions of pages with staffed Q&A, Datasite earns its premium. For a founder-led biotech, a licensing process, or a mid-size raise where you want the specialist and the member discount, ShareVault fits better and costs less. Both are quote-only, so budget by requesting real numbers for your scope.

Is ShareVault suitable for life sciences companies sharing clinical trial data?

Yes — this is precisely what ShareVault is built for. Per its own life-sciences page, ShareVault "empowers life sciences companies—across biotech, pharma, medtech, CROs, and beyond—to collaborate with precision and safeguard sensitive IP," and it markets templates aligned to clinical trial data and regulatory submissions. Its FAQ claims compliance with "FDA 21 CFR Part 11, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001, and SOC 2" — report those as ShareVault's own claims, not an independently audited fact, and verify each against your quote. The core IP-protection stack for clinical data is dynamic watermarking, remote shredding, and screen-capture blocking, in ShareVault's words. Pharma BD teams accept any professional, access-gated VDR, so the endorsement is a helpful signal rather than a requirement — but for a team that wants a life-science specialist, ShareVault is a credible, purpose-built choice.

Is ShareVault worth it for a small company or a single deal?

Often not, on cost grounds. ShareVault is quote-only, billed by storage volume and project duration per our top-10 ranking, and aimed at ongoing life-science programs rather than one-off transactions. A single small deal or a pre-revenue team running one short room rarely needs the specialist stack — and cannot see a price before a sales call, which our 2.7/5 Value score reflects. If you are a BIO member, the 25%+ member discount can make a quote reasonable, so it is worth requesting. But price-transparent buyers and single-deal teams usually do better on a published flat rate: for context, Peony is $52/user/month for unlimited data rooms with free viewers, and Peony is GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA compliant. Route yourself to ShareVault alternatives if a transparent number matters more than the specialization.

Does ShareVault lock you into an annual contract, and how does its billing work?

ShareVault does not publish contract terms on its site, so confirm them in your quote. What it does say: pricing is "transparent, no-surprise" with "no hidden fees," and you "pay only for the features and storage you need," per its pricing page. Our top-10 ranking characterizes the model as quote-based across three tiers (Express, Pro, Enterprise), priced by storage volume and project duration, with no setup fees. Because no standard list price is published, the practical billing questions to pin down in writing are: the term length and renewal, storage overage rates, what triggers a move between tiers, and which features are bundled versus add-ons. On trial: ShareVault's own site advertises a free trial without stating a duration, while bio.org describes a free one-month trial — attribute each to its source and confirm your actual trial length with sales.

How does ShareVault handle small-business deal management?

ShareVault can run a small-business deal, but it is not optimized for the price-sensitive, single-transaction end of the market. Its lightest tier, Express, is positioned "For Smaller Deals or Simple Sharing," per ShareVault's pricing page — but even Express is quote-only, so a small business cannot self-serve a price. The platform's strengths (BIO endorsement, remote shredding via IRM, life-science templates, batch PII/PHI redaction) are aimed at ongoing life-science programs, not a one-off SMB sale. Document uploading also requires manual tagging and folder specification, which reviewers describe as tedious versus AI auto-indexing, per our top-10 ranking. For a small business that wants a live room today at a known price, a transparently priced flat-rate room is usually the better tool; see our ShareVault alternatives guide for the options.

Related resources

• Peony vs ShareVault comparison — the structured head-to-head
• ShareVault alternatives — transparent-pricing and flat-rate options
• Best data rooms for healthcare and life sciences — the vertical roundup and the BIO deep dive
• Biotech data room guide — how to structure a life-science room
• 15 best data rooms ($0 to $200K) — the full-spectrum ranking
• VDR pricing guide — benchmarks to sanity-check any quote
• Redaction in due diligence — where batch redaction fits
• Dynamic watermarking guide — what watermarks do and do not protect
• What is a virtual data room? — the category primer

Last updated: July 2026

Sources

• ShareVault pricing (quote-gated across Express/Pro/Enterprise; "transparent, no-surprise pricing"; free trial with no stated duration; plan pages advertise "Pricing as low as $200/mth" based on minimum storage, a 12-month prepaid term, and applicable discounts): ShareVault — Pricing
• ShareVault capabilities (Bulk AI-Powered Redaction, Information Rights Management remote shredding, dynamic watermarking, secure viewers): ShareVault — Features
• ShareVault life-sciences positioning and compliance claims (FDA 21 CFR Part 11, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2; dynamic watermarking, remote shredding, screen-capture blocking; ISO-Certified): ShareVault — Life Sciences
• ShareVault company history (founded 2003 as Pandesa Corporation; VDR to market 2006; Los Gatos, CA): ShareVault — About
• BIO endorsement, Business Solutions member discount (25%+ savings), and free one-month trial: BIO Business Solutions — ShareVault